Demographics details for Hospers, IA vs Richmond hill, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hospers, IA vs Richmond hill, GA.
| Data | Hospers | Richmond hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 710 | 18,091 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,659 | $83,519 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hospers vs Richmond hill
- The population in Richmond hill is higher at 18,091, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- The median age in Richmond hill is higher at 31.0 years, compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- Richmond hill has a higher median income of $83,519, compared to $69,659 in Hospers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hospers at 57.0% compared to 35.0% in Richmond hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Richmond hill at 10%, compared to 6% in Hospers.
- Richmond hill has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Hospers.
Demographics
Demographics Hospers vs Richmond hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hospers | Richmond hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 13 |
| White | 70 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hospers vs Richmond hill
- In Richmond hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
- In Richmond hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Hospers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hospers at 26% compared to 11% in Richmond hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richmond hill at 8%, compared to 3% in Hospers.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hospers at 1% compared to 0% in Richmond hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hospers | Richmond hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hospers vs Richmond hill
- In Richmond hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richmond hill at 21.8% versus 16.6% in Hospers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hospers at 15.2% compared to 14.2% in Richmond hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 16.2% in Richmond hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hospers at 38.1% compared to 34.4% in Richmond hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hospers at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hospers | Richmond hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.0% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 26.6% (189) | 7.7% (1,395) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (102) | 5.7% (1,037) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (80) | 19.5% (3,532) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hospers vs Richmond hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Hospers have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Richmond hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hospers hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 7.7% in Richmond hill.
- More residents in Hospers have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 5.7% in Richmond hill.
- In Richmond hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.