Demographics details for Hospers, IA vs Randleman, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hospers, IA vs Randleman, NC.
| Data | Hospers | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 710 | 4,642 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $69,659 | $63,040 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hospers vs Randleman
- The population in Randleman is higher at 4,642, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- The median age in Randleman is higher at 33.5 years, compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher median income of $69,659 compared to $63,040 in Randleman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hospers at 57.0% compared to 38.0% in Randleman.
- The poverty level is higher in Randleman at 10%, compared to 6% in Hospers.
- Randleman has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Hospers.
Demographics
Demographics Hospers vs Randleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hospers | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 70 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Hospers vs Randleman
- In Randleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Randleman at 77% compared to 70% in Hospers.
- Both Hospers and Randleman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hospers at 26% compared to 9% in Randleman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Randleman at 8%, compared to 3% in Hospers.
- In Randleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Hospers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hospers | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hospers vs Randleman
- In Randleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Randleman at 25.7% versus 16.6% in Hospers.
- Randleman has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 15.2% in Hospers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 17.7% in Randleman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hospers at 38.1% compared to 37.5% in Randleman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Hospers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hospers | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.3% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 26.6% (189) | 16.5% (768) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (102) | 22.1% (1,026) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (80) | 6.9% (320) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hospers vs Randleman
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Hospers and Randleman at 0.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hospers hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 16.5% in Randleman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Randleman at 22.1%, compared to 14.4% in Hospers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hospers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.