Demographics details for Hospers, IA vs Middle river, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hospers, IA vs Middle river, MD.
| Data | Hospers | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 710 | 31,155 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $69,659 | $72,970 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Hospers vs Middle river
- The population in Middle river is higher at 31,155, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- The median age in Middle river is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- Middle river has a higher median income of $72,970, compared to $69,659 in Hospers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hospers at 57.0% compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
- The poverty level is higher in Middle river at 8%, compared to 6% in Hospers.
- Middle river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Hospers.
Demographics
Demographics Hospers vs Middle river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hospers | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 29 |
| White | 70 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hospers vs Middle river
- In Middle river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 51% in Middle river.
- In Middle river, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Hospers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hospers at 26% compared to 8% in Middle river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Middle river at 5%, compared to 3% in Hospers.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hospers at 1% compared to 0% in Middle river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hospers | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hospers vs Middle river
- In Middle river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Middle river at 24.1% versus 16.6% in Hospers.
- Middle river has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 15.2% in Hospers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
- Middle river has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 38.1% in Hospers.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Hospers and Middle river at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hospers | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 2.6% (818) |
| High School Diploma | 26.6% (189) | 20.1% (6,254) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (102) | 14.8% (4,616) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (80) | 19.4% (6,048) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hospers vs Middle river
- In Middle river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.3% in Hospers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hospers hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 20.1% in Middle river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Middle river at 14.8%, compared to 14.4% in Hospers.
- In Middle river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.