Demographics details for Hospers, IA vs Greenwood, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hospers, IA vs Greenwood, IN.

Data Hospers Greenwood
Population 710 65,406
Median Age 29.8 years 36.2 years
Median Income $69,659 $75,398
Married Families 57.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 6% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.8

Population Comparison: Hospers vs Greenwood

  • The population in Greenwood is higher at 65,406, compared to 710 in Hospers.
  • The median age in Greenwood is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
  • Greenwood has a higher median income of $75,398, compared to $69,659 in Hospers.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hospers at 57.0% compared to 40.0% in Greenwood.
  • The poverty level is higher in Greenwood at 7%, compared to 6% in Hospers.
  • Greenwood has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Hospers.

Demographics

Demographics Hospers vs Greenwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hospers Greenwood
Black Data is updating 4
White 70 76
Asian Data is updating 7
Hispanic 26 7
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hospers vs Greenwood

  • In Greenwood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Hospers.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Greenwood at 76% compared to 70% in Hospers.
  • In Greenwood, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Hospers.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hospers at 26% compared to 7% in Greenwood.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Greenwood at 6%, compared to 3% in Hospers.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hospers at 1% compared to 0% in Greenwood.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hospers Greenwood
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 10.4%
Depression 16.6% 27.4%
Smoking 15.2% 17.2%
Binge Drinking 21.6% 16.9%
Obesity 38.1% 40.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hospers vs Greenwood

  • In Greenwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Greenwood at 27.4% versus 16.6% in Hospers.
  • Greenwood has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 15.2% in Hospers.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 16.9% in Greenwood.
  • Greenwood has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 38.1% in Hospers.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hospers at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Greenwood.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hospers Greenwood
No Schooling 0.3% (2) 1.5% (1,000)
High School Diploma 26.6% (189) 17.0% (11,136)
Less than High School 14.4% (102) 10.7% (6,995)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (80) 20.0% (13,060)

Education Levels Comparison: Hospers vs Greenwood

  • In Greenwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Hospers.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hospers hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 17.0% in Greenwood.
  • More residents in Hospers have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 10.7% in Greenwood.
  • In Greenwood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.