Demographics details for Hospers, IA vs Chicago, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hospers, IA vs Chicago, IL.
| Data | Hospers | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 710 | 2,665,039 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $69,659 | $71,673 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Hospers vs Chicago
- The population in Chicago is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- The median age in Chicago is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673, compared to $69,659 in Hospers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hospers at 57.0% compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- The poverty level is higher in Chicago at 18%, compared to 6% in Hospers.
- Chicago has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 3.2% in Hospers.
Demographics
Demographics Hospers vs Chicago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hospers | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 29 |
| White | 70 | 23 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hospers vs Chicago
- In Chicago, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Hospers.
- Chicago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 26% in Hospers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chicago at 10%, compared to 3% in Hospers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hospers and Chicago at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hospers | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hospers vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hospers at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Chicago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hospers at 15.2% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hospers at 38.1% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hospers at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hospers | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 1.7% (44,697) |
| High School Diploma | 26.6% (189) | 13.3% (354,780) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (102) | 15.8% (419,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (80) | 30.4% (811,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hospers vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in Hospers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hospers hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chicago at 15.8%, compared to 14.4% in Hospers.
- In Chicago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.