Demographics details for Hospers, IA vs Brundidge, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hospers, IA vs Brundidge, AL.
Data | Hospers | Brundidge |
---|---|---|
Population | 710 | 2,034 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 49.9 years |
Median Income | $69,659 | $37,627 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Hospers vs Brundidge
- The population in Brundidge is higher at 2,034, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- The median age in Brundidge is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher median income of $69,659 compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hospers at 57.0% compared to 39.0% in Brundidge.
- The poverty level is higher in Brundidge at 20%, compared to 6% in Hospers.
- Brundidge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Hospers.
Demographics
Demographics Hospers vs Brundidge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hospers | Brundidge |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 67 |
White | 70 | 12 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 26 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hospers vs Brundidge
- In Brundidge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
- Both Hospers and Brundidge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hospers at 26% compared to 16% in Brundidge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brundidge at 5%, compared to 3% in Hospers.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hospers at 1% compared to 0% in Brundidge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hospers | Brundidge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 20.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 15.2% |
Depression | 16.6% | 20.7% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 12.2% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 45.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hospers vs Brundidge
- In Brundidge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brundidge at 20.7% versus 16.6% in Hospers.
- Brundidge has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 15.2% in Hospers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 12.2% in Brundidge.
- Brundidge has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 38.1% in Hospers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 14.0% in Hospers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hospers | Brundidge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.5% (11) |
High School Diploma | 26.6% (189) | 35.9% (731) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (102) | 22.7% (461) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (80) | 11.8% (240) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hospers vs Brundidge
- In Brundidge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Hospers.
- In Brundidge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.9% compared to 26.6% in Hospers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brundidge at 22.7%, compared to 14.4% in Hospers.
- In Brundidge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.