Demographics details for Horsham, PA vs Manhattan, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Horsham, PA vs Manhattan, KS.
Data | Horsham | Manhattan |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,683 | 53,829 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 24.7 years |
Median Income | $96,284 | $55,316 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Horsham vs Manhattan
- The population in Manhattan is higher at 53,829, compared to 15,683 in Horsham.
- Residents in Horsham have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 24.7 years in Manhattan.
- Horsham has a higher median income of $96,284 compared to $55,316 in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Horsham at 41.0% compared to 29.0% in Manhattan.
- The poverty level is higher in Manhattan at 15%, compared to 4% in Horsham.
- Manhattan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Horsham.
Demographics
Demographics Horsham vs Manhattan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Horsham | Manhattan |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 5 |
White | 73 | 74 |
Asian | 9 | 5 |
Hispanic | 12 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Horsham vs Manhattan
- In Manhattan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Horsham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manhattan at 74% compared to 73% in Horsham.
- The Asian population is larger in Horsham at 9% compared to 5% in Manhattan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Horsham at 12% compared to 8% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manhattan at 7%, compared to 2% in Horsham.
- In Manhattan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Horsham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Horsham | Manhattan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 10.1% |
Depression | 20.5% | 20.2% |
Smoking | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 20.6% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 32.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Horsham vs Manhattan
- In Manhattan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.5% in Horsham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Horsham at 20.5% compared to 20.2% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Horsham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manhattan at 20.6% compared to 19.0% in Horsham.
- Manhattan has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 30.1% in Horsham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Manhattan at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Horsham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Horsham | Manhattan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (111) | 0.5% (256) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (2,526) | 5.8% (3,138) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (2,113) | 4.2% (2,256) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (4,458) | 26.0% (14,017) |
Education Levels Comparison: Horsham vs Manhattan
- A higher percentage of residents in Horsham have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Horsham hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 5.8% in Manhattan.
- More residents in Horsham have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 4.2% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Horsham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 26.0% in Manhattan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.