Demographics details for Hornick, IA vs Cross city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hornick, IA vs Cross city, FL.
| Data | Hornick | Cross city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 253 | 1,754 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $78,750 | $44,500 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hornick vs Cross city
- The population in Cross city is higher at 1,754, compared to 253 in Hornick.
- The median age in Cross city is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 32.8 years in Hornick.
- Hornick has a higher median income of $78,750 compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hornick at 51.0% compared to 47.0% in Cross city.
- The poverty level is higher in Cross city at 18%, compared to 5% in Hornick.
- Cross city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Hornick.
Demographics
Demographics Hornick vs Cross city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hornick | Cross city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 20 |
| White | 96 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hornick vs Cross city
- In Cross city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Hornick.
- Hornick has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 61% in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Hornick.
- Cross city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 1% in Hornick.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cross city at 8%, compared to 3% in Hornick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hornick and Cross city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hornick | Cross city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 29.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.2% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hornick vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.3% in Hornick.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cross city at 23.8% versus 20.4% in Hornick.
- Cross city has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 18.3% in Hornick.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hornick at 23.2% compared to 14.8% in Cross city.
- Cross city has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 36.5% in Hornick.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 4.0% in Hornick.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hornick | Cross city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (63) | 39.2% (688) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (30) | 11.7% (205) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.7% (12) | 7.8% (136) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hornick vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Hornick.
- In Cross city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 24.9% in Hornick.
- More residents in Hornick have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 11.7% in Cross city.
- In Cross city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.8% compared to 4.7% in Hornick.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.