Demographics details for Horn lake, MS vs Union springs, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Horn lake, MS vs Union springs, AL.
Data | Horn lake | Union springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,550 | 3,242 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 28.1 years |
Median Income | $57,111 | $24,921 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 17.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Horn lake vs Union springs
- In Horn lake, the population is higher at 26,550, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- Residents in Horn lake have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Horn lake has a higher median income of $57,111 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Horn lake at 31.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 19% in Horn lake.
- Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.7% in Horn lake.
Demographics
Demographics Horn lake vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Horn lake | Union springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 45 | 69 |
White | 40 | 4 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Horn lake vs Union springs
- In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 45% in Horn lake.
- Horn lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- Both Horn lake and Union springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Union springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 9% in Horn lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Horn lake at 5% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Horn lake and Union springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Horn lake | Union springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 16.9% |
Depression | 23.5% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 20.4% | 25.5% |
Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 11.1% |
Obesity | 43.4% | 49.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Horn lake vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.2% in Horn lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Horn lake at 23.5% compared to 20.8% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 20.4% in Horn lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Horn lake at 12.9% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 43.4% in Horn lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Horn lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Horn lake | Union springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (252) | 3.6% (117) |
High School Diploma | 18.1% (4,818) | 15.1% (489) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (4,319) | 33.7% (1,092) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (2,777) | 7.3% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Horn lake vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.9% in Horn lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Horn lake hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 16.3% in Horn lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Horn lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.