Demographics details for Horn lake, MS vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Horn lake, MS vs Hopkins, SC.
| Data | Horn lake | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,550 | 1,738 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,111 | $57,262 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Horn lake vs Hopkins
- In Horn lake, the population is higher at 26,550, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 35.5 years in Horn lake.
- Hopkins has a higher median income of $57,262, compared to $57,111 in Horn lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Horn lake at 31.0% compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- Horn lake has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The unemployment rate in Horn lake is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Horn lake vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Horn lake | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 83 |
| White | 40 | 16 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Horn lake vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 45% in Horn lake.
- Horn lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- The Asian population is larger in Horn lake at 1% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Horn lake at 9% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Horn lake at 5% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Horn lake and Hopkins at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Horn lake | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 43.4% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Horn lake vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.2% in Horn lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Horn lake at 23.5% compared to 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 20.4% in Horn lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hopkins at 16.0% compared to 12.9% in Horn lake.
- Hopkins has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 43.4% in Horn lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 13.0% in Horn lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Horn lake | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (252) | 0.1% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (4,818) | 20.8% (362) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (4,319) | 11.3% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (2,777) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Horn lake vs Hopkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Horn lake have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 18.1% in Horn lake.
- More residents in Horn lake have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 10.5% in Horn lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.