Demographics details for Hopkins, SC vs Sacred heart, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hopkins, SC vs Sacred heart, MN.
Data | Hopkins | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,738 | 498 |
Median Age | 53.9 years | 53.5 years |
Median Income | $57,262 | $59,107 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Hopkins vs Sacred heart
- In Hopkins, the population is higher at 1,738, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
- Residents in Hopkins have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 53.5 years in Sacred heart.
- Sacred heart has a higher median income of $59,107, compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- In Sacred heart, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- The poverty level is higher in Sacred heart at 6%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- Sacred heart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Hopkins vs Sacred heart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hopkins | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
Black | 83 | Data is updating |
White | 16 | 87 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 13 |
Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hopkins vs Sacred heart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hopkins at 83% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sacred heart at 87% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- Both Hopkins and Sacred heart have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sacred heart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hopkins at 1% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hopkins and Sacred heart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hopkins | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 9.6% |
Depression | 18.8% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 21.3% | 17.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 19.9% |
Obesity | 44.2% | 37.6% |
Disability Percentage | 34.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hopkins vs Sacred heart
- More residents in Hopkins report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sacred heart at 23.3% versus 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hopkins at 21.3% compared to 17.7% in Sacred heart.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 16.0% in Hopkins.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hopkins at 44.2% compared to 37.6% in Sacred heart.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Sacred heart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hopkins | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 20.8% (362) | 28.1% (140) |
Less than High School | 11.3% (197) | 28.5% (142) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (281) | 13.3% (66) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hopkins vs Sacred heart
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
- In Sacred heart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 20.8% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacred heart at 28.5%, compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 13.3% in Sacred heart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.