Demographics details for Hopkins, SC vs Rockford, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hopkins, SC vs Rockford, WA.
| Data | Hopkins | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,738 | 565 |
| Median Age | 53.9 years | 50.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,262 | $68,750 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hopkins vs Rockford
- In Hopkins, the population is higher at 1,738, compared to 565 in Rockford.
- Residents in Hopkins have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 50.4 years in Rockford.
- Rockford has a higher median income of $68,750, compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- In Rockford, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- The poverty level is identical in both Hopkins and Rockford at 0%.
- Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Hopkins vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hopkins | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 83 | Data is updating |
| White | 16 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Hopkins vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hopkins at 83% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockford at 84% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- Both Hopkins and Rockford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Rockford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockford at 10%, compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- In Rockford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hopkins | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 34.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hopkins vs Rockford
- More residents in Hopkins report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.4% in Rockford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rockford at 28.8% versus 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hopkins at 21.3% compared to 15.2% in Rockford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockford at 18.4% compared to 16.0% in Hopkins.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hopkins at 44.2% compared to 29.9% in Rockford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 17.0% in Rockford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hopkins | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (362) | 11.9% (67) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (197) | 7.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (281) | 12.9% (73) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hopkins vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 11.9% in Rockford.
- More residents in Hopkins have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 7.4% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 12.9% in Rockford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.