Demographics details for Hopkins, SC vs Port arthur, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hopkins, SC vs Port arthur, TX.
| Data | Hopkins | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,738 | 55,579 |
| Median Age | 53.9 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $57,262 | $45,357 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 11.0 |
Population Comparison: Hopkins vs Port arthur
- The population in Port arthur is higher at 55,579, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- Residents in Hopkins have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 33.7 years in Port arthur.
- Hopkins has a higher median income of $57,262 compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- The poverty level is higher in Port arthur at 23%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- Port arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 11.0% compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Hopkins vs Port arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hopkins | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 83 | 43 |
| White | 16 | 3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hopkins vs Port arthur
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hopkins at 83% compared to 43% in Port arthur.
- Hopkins has a higher percentage of White residents at 16% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Hopkins.
- Port arthur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port arthur at 13%, compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hopkins | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 34.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hopkins vs Port arthur
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Hopkins and Port arthur at 19.5%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port arthur at 20.4% versus 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Port arthur has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 21.3% in Hopkins.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hopkins at 16.0% compared to 13.9% in Port arthur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hopkins at 44.2% compared to 42.2% in Port arthur.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 15.0% in Port arthur.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hopkins | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 2.5% (1,383) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (362) | 19.6% (10,902) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (197) | 23.7% (13,180) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (281) | 7.1% (3,955) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hopkins vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 19.6% in Port arthur.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port arthur at 23.7%, compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.