Demographics details for Hopkins, SC vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hopkins, SC vs Kings mountain, NC.
| Data | Hopkins | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,738 | 11,638 |
| Median Age | 53.9 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $57,262 | $45,301 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hopkins vs Kings mountain
- The population in Kings mountain is higher at 11,638, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- Residents in Hopkins have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 41.5 years in Kings mountain.
- Hopkins has a higher median income of $57,262 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hopkins at 25.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- The poverty level is higher in Kings mountain at 11%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- Kings mountain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Hopkins vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hopkins | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 83 | 25 |
| White | 16 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hopkins vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hopkins at 83% compared to 25% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- In Kings mountain, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Hopkins.
- Kings mountain has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kings mountain at 3%, compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hopkins and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hopkins | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 34.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hopkins vs Kings mountain
- More residents in Hopkins report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hopkins at 21.3% compared to 20.9% in Kings mountain.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 16.0% in Hopkins.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hopkins at 44.2% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 14.0% in Kings mountain.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hopkins | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 0.4% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (362) | 21.7% (2,528) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (197) | 17.8% (2,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (281) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hopkins vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 20.8% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.