Demographics details for Hopkins, SC vs Hesperia, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hopkins, SC vs Hesperia, CA.
| Data | Hopkins | Hesperia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,738 | 100,744 |
| Median Age | 53.9 years | 32.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,262 | $67,698 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Hopkins vs Hesperia
- The population in Hesperia is higher at 100,744, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- Residents in Hopkins have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 32.2 years in Hesperia.
- Hesperia has a higher median income of $67,698, compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- In Hesperia, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- The poverty level is higher in Hesperia at 13%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- Hesperia has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Hopkins vs Hesperia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hopkins | Hesperia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 83 | 4 |
| White | 16 | 15 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 62 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hopkins vs Hesperia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hopkins at 83% compared to 4% in Hesperia.
- Hopkins has a higher percentage of White residents at 16% compared to 15% in Hesperia.
- In Hesperia, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Hopkins.
- Hesperia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 62%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hesperia at 16%, compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- In Hesperia, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hopkins | Hesperia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 40.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 34.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hopkins vs Hesperia
- More residents in Hopkins report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.5% in Hesperia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hesperia at 20.1% versus 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hopkins at 21.3% compared to 16.0% in Hesperia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hopkins at 16.0% compared to 15.5% in Hesperia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hopkins at 44.2% compared to 40.4% in Hesperia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 12.0% in Hesperia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hopkins | Hesperia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 1.6% (1,604) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (362) | 18.2% (18,342) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (197) | 25.4% (25,622) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (281) | 6.5% (6,534) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hopkins vs Hesperia
- In Hesperia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 18.2% in Hesperia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hesperia at 25.4%, compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 6.5% in Hesperia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.