Demographics details for Hopkins, SC vs Fort lupton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hopkins, SC vs Fort lupton, CO.
| Data | Hopkins | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,738 | 8,829 |
| Median Age | 53.9 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,262 | $71,293 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hopkins vs Fort lupton
- The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- Residents in Hopkins have a higher median age of 53.9 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- In Fort lupton, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort lupton at 10%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hopkins and Fort lupton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Hopkins vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hopkins | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 83 | Data is updating |
| White | 16 | 26 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 53 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hopkins vs Fort lupton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hopkins at 83% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort lupton at 26% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- Both Hopkins and Fort lupton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- In Fort lupton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hopkins.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hopkins | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 34.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hopkins vs Fort lupton
- More residents in Hopkins report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort lupton at 19.9% versus 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hopkins at 21.3% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Hopkins.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hopkins at 44.2% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hopkins | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 1.6% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (362) | 16.2% (1,428) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (197) | 28.0% (2,476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (281) | 7.0% (622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hopkins vs Fort lupton
- In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopkins hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.