Demographics details for Hopedale, IL vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hopedale, IL vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Hopedale | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 809 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 56.9 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,167 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Hopedale vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 809 in Hopedale.
- Residents in Hopedale have a higher median age of 56.9 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $59,167 in Hopedale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hopedale at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Hopedale and Clayton at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Hopedale is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Hopedale vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hopedale | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 22 |
| White | 97 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 13 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hopedale vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 3% in Hopedale.
- Hopedale has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Hopedale.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 0% in Hopedale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 0% in Hopedale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hopedale and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hopedale | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hopedale vs Clayton
- More residents in Hopedale report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 22.5% in Hopedale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hopedale at 16.4% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hopedale at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 35.1% in Hopedale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hopedale at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hopedale | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (22) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (159) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (49) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (153) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hopedale vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopedale have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopedale hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Hopedale have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopedale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.