Demographics details for Hope, AR vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope, AR vs Port gibson, MS.
Data | Hope | Port gibson |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,624 | 1,206 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 47.3 years |
Median Income | $43,018 | $24,773 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 22.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 30% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Hope vs Port gibson
- In Hope, the population is higher at 8,624, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 36.2 years in Hope.
- Hope has a higher median income of $43,018 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hope at 29.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 20% in Hope.
- Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.5% in Hope.
Demographics
Demographics Hope vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hope | Port gibson |
---|---|---|
Black | 48 | 82 |
White | 28 | 12 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hope vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 48% in Hope.
- Hope has a higher percentage of White residents at 28% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- Both Hope and Port gibson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hope at 19% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port gibson at 6%, compared to 4% in Hope.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hope at 1% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hope | Port gibson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.0% |
Depression | 24.8% | 20.0% |
Smoking | 25.2% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 10.2% |
Obesity | 48.0% | 50.5% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope vs Port gibson
- More residents in Hope report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.0% in Port gibson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope at 24.8% compared to 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hope at 25.2% compared to 24.8% in Port gibson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hope at 12.1% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 48.0% in Hope.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Hope.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hope | Port gibson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (258) | 0.5% (6) |
High School Diploma | 20.8% (1,790) | 9.8% (118) |
Less than High School | 19.0% (1,641) | 13.3% (160) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (863) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope vs Port gibson
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- More residents in Hope have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- In Port gibson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 10.0% in Hope.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.