Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Red river, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Red river, NM.
Data | Hope mills | Red river |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,824 | 539 |
Median Age | 32.5 years | 43.3 years |
Median Income | $57,864 | $49,479 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Red river
- In Hope mills, the population is higher at 17,824, compared to 539 in Red river.
- The median age in Red river is higher at 43.3 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Hope mills has a higher median income of $57,864 compared to $49,479 in Red river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hope mills at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- The poverty level is higher in Red river at 12%, compared to 10% in Hope mills.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hope mills and Red river at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Hope mills vs Red river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hope mills | Red river |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | Data is updating |
White | 35 | 89 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Red river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hope mills at 34% compared to 0% in Red river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Red river at 89% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
- The Asian population is larger in Hope mills at 1% compared to 0% in Red river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hope mills at 15% compared to 9% in Red river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hope mills at 13% compared to 2% in Red river.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hope mills at 2% compared to 0% in Red river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hope mills | Red river |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 10.4% |
Depression | 25.9% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 27.1% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Red river
- More residents in Hope mills report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.2% in Red river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope mills at 25.9% compared to 22.0% in Red river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hope mills at 17.5% compared to 15.8% in Red river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hope mills at 17.6% compared to 17.1% in Red river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hope mills at 38.5% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Red river at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Hope mills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hope mills | Red river |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,614) | 5.9% (32) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (1,237) | 6.7% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,437) | 26.2% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Red river
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills hold a high school diploma at 14.7% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- More residents in Hope mills have less than a high school education at 6.9% compared to 6.7% in Red river.
- In Red river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 13.7% in Hope mills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.