Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Manns choice, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Manns choice, PA.
Data | Hope mills | Manns choice |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,824 | 312 |
Median Age | 32.5 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $57,864 | $47,500 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Manns choice
- In Hope mills, the population is higher at 17,824, compared to 312 in Manns choice.
- The median age in Manns choice is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Hope mills has a higher median income of $57,864 compared to $47,500 in Manns choice.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Hope mills and Manns choice at 34.0%.
- Hope mills has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The unemployment rate in Hope mills is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Manns choice.
Demographics
Demographics Hope mills vs Manns choice provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hope mills | Manns choice |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | Data is updating |
White | 35 | 97 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Manns choice
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hope mills at 34% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manns choice at 97% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
- The Asian population is larger in Hope mills at 1% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hope mills at 15% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hope mills at 13% compared to 3% in Manns choice.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hope mills at 2% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hope mills | Manns choice |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.2% |
Depression | 25.9% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 21.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Manns choice
- In Manns choice, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope mills at 25.9% compared to 24.1% in Manns choice.
- Manns choice has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 17.5% in Hope mills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manns choice at 18.8% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hope mills at 38.5% compared to 36.7% in Manns choice.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hope mills at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Manns choice.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hope mills | Manns choice |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 1.0% (3) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,614) | 31.4% (98) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (1,237) | 11.5% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,437) | 1.0% (3) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Manns choice
- In Manns choice, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Hope mills.
- In Manns choice, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 14.7% in Hope mills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manns choice at 11.5%, compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 1.0% in Manns choice.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.