Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Lanett, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Lanett, AL.
| Data | Hope mills | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,824 | 6,759 |
| Median Age | 32.5 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,864 | $48,125 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Lanett
- In Hope mills, the population is higher at 17,824, compared to 6,759 in Lanett.
- The median age in Lanett is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Hope mills has a higher median income of $57,864 compared to $48,125 in Lanett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hope mills at 34.0% compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
- Hope mills has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Lanett.
- The unemployment rate in Hope mills is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Lanett.
Demographics
Demographics Hope mills vs Lanett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hope mills | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 73 |
| White | 35 | 16 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Lanett
- In Lanett, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 34% in Hope mills.
- Hope mills has a higher percentage of White residents at 35% compared to 16% in Lanett.
- The Asian population is larger in Hope mills at 1% compared to 0% in Lanett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hope mills at 15% compared to 8% in Lanett.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hope mills at 13% compared to 3% in Lanett.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hope mills at 2% compared to 0% in Lanett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hope mills | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Lanett
- In Lanett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope mills at 25.9% compared to 22.1% in Lanett.
- Lanett has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 17.5% in Hope mills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hope mills at 17.6% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
- Lanett has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 38.5% in Hope mills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lanett at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Hope mills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hope mills | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 1.3% (90) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,614) | 18.9% (1,277) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (1,237) | 20.3% (1,369) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,437) | 7.4% (498) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Lanett
- In Lanett, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Hope mills.
- In Lanett, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 14.7% in Hope mills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lanett at 20.3%, compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 7.4% in Lanett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.