Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Hilmar, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Hilmar, CA.
| Data | Hope mills | Hilmar |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,824 | 11,136 |
| Median Age | 32.5 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,864 | $71,753 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Hilmar
- In Hope mills, the population is higher at 17,824, compared to 11,136 in Hilmar.
- The median age in Hilmar is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Hilmar has a higher median income of $71,753, compared to $57,864 in Hope mills.
- In Hilmar, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Hope mills.
- The poverty level is higher in Hilmar at 15%, compared to 10% in Hope mills.
- Hilmar has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Hope mills.
Demographics
Demographics Hope mills vs Hilmar provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hope mills | Hilmar |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 1 |
| White | 35 | 52 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 42 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Hilmar
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hope mills at 34% compared to 1% in Hilmar.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hilmar at 52% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
- In Hilmar, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Hope mills.
- Hilmar has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 42%, compared to 15% in Hope mills.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hope mills at 13% compared to 3% in Hilmar.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hope mills at 2% compared to 0% in Hilmar.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hope mills | Hilmar |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.9% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Hilmar
- More residents in Hope mills report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Hilmar.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope mills at 25.9% compared to 0.0% in Hilmar.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hope mills at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Hilmar.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hope mills at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Hilmar.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hope mills at 38.5% compared to 0.0% in Hilmar.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hope mills at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Hilmar.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hope mills | Hilmar |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 2.6% (294) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,614) | 16.8% (1,868) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (1,237) | 35.7% (3,978) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,437) | 6.9% (769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Hilmar
- In Hilmar, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.4% in Hope mills.
- In Hilmar, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.8% compared to 14.7% in Hope mills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hilmar at 35.7%, compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 6.9% in Hilmar.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.