Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Griffin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Griffin, GA.
| Data | Hope mills | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,824 | 23,693 |
| Median Age | 32.5 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,864 | $42,047 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Griffin
- The population in Griffin is higher at 23,693, compared to 17,824 in Hope mills.
- The median age in Griffin is higher at 33.2 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Hope mills has a higher median income of $57,864 compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hope mills at 34.0% compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 15%, compared to 10% in Hope mills.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Hope mills.
Demographics
Demographics Hope mills vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hope mills | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 52 |
| White | 35 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Griffin
- In Griffin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 34% in Hope mills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 36% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
- Both Hope mills and Griffin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hope mills at 15% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hope mills at 13% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hope mills at 2% compared to 1% in Griffin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hope mills | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope mills at 25.9% compared to 19.7% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 17.5% in Hope mills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hope mills at 17.6% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Griffin has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 38.5% in Hope mills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hope mills at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hope mills | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 2.2% (517) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,614) | 22.6% (5,347) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (1,237) | 16.3% (3,859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,437) | 11.9% (2,819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.4% in Hope mills.
- In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 14.7% in Hope mills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 16.3%, compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.