Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Fultondale, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Fultondale, AL.
Data | Hope mills | Fultondale |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,824 | 9,677 |
Median Age | 32.5 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $57,864 | $72,741 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Fultondale
- In Hope mills, the population is higher at 17,824, compared to 9,677 in Fultondale.
- The median age in Fultondale is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Fultondale has a higher median income of $72,741, compared to $57,864 in Hope mills.
- In Fultondale, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Hope mills.
- Hope mills has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- The unemployment rate in Hope mills is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fultondale.
Demographics
Demographics Hope mills vs Fultondale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hope mills | Fultondale |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | 35 |
White | 35 | 51 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 15 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 34% in Hope mills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fultondale at 51% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
- In Fultondale, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Hope mills.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hope mills at 15% compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hope mills at 13% compared to 3% in Fultondale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hope mills at 2% compared to 0% in Fultondale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hope mills | Fultondale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Depression | 25.9% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope mills at 25.9% compared to 23.9% in Fultondale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hope mills at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hope mills at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hope mills at 38.5% compared to 36.4% in Fultondale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hope mills at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Fultondale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hope mills | Fultondale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 1.3% (121) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,614) | 17.1% (1,657) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (1,237) | 10.4% (1,005) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,437) | 18.1% (1,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Hope mills.
- In Fultondale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Hope mills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fultondale at 10.4%, compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
- In Fultondale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 13.7% in Hope mills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.