Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Chapman, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Chapman, KS.
| Data | Hope mills | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,824 | 1,371 |
| Median Age | 32.5 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,864 | $66,964 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Chapman
- In Hope mills, the population is higher at 17,824, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- The median age in Chapman is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Chapman has a higher median income of $66,964, compared to $57,864 in Hope mills.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hope mills at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Chapman.
- Hope mills has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Chapman.
- The unemployment rate in Hope mills is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Hope mills vs Chapman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hope mills | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | Data is updating |
| White | 35 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hope mills at 34% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chapman at 81% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
- In Chapman, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Hope mills.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hope mills at 15% compared to 7% in Chapman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hope mills at 13% compared to 7% in Chapman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hope mills and Chapman at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hope mills | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Chapman
- More residents in Hope mills report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Chapman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope mills at 25.9% compared to 21.4% in Chapman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hope mills at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Chapman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hope mills at 38.5% compared to 37.3% in Chapman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hope mills at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Chapman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hope mills | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,614) | 12.3% (168) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (1,237) | 5.1% (70) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,437) | 15.5% (212) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills hold a high school diploma at 14.7% compared to 12.3% in Chapman.
- More residents in Hope mills have less than a high school education at 6.9% compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
- In Chapman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 13.7% in Hope mills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.