Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Chandler, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Chandler, OK.
| Data | Hope mills | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,824 | 2,895 |
| Median Age | 32.5 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $57,864 | $48,168 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Chandler
- In Hope mills, the population is higher at 17,824, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- The median age in Chandler is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
- Hope mills has a higher median income of $57,864 compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Hope mills.
- The poverty level is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 10% in Hope mills.
- The unemployment rate in Hope mills is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Hope mills vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hope mills | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 34 | 9 |
| White | 35 | 72 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hope mills at 34% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 72% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Hope mills.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hope mills at 15% compared to 1% in Chandler.
- Both Hope mills and Chandler have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 13%.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Hope mills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hope mills | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Chandler
- In Chandler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hope mills at 25.9% compared to 24.6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 17.5% in Hope mills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hope mills at 17.6% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 38.5% in Hope mills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Hope mills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hope mills | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.7% (2,614) | 23.9% (691) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (1,237) | 12.8% (372) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,437) | 16.2% (469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 14.7% in Hope mills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chandler at 12.8%, compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Hope mills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.