Demographics details for Hope mills, NC vs Central square, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hope mills, NC vs Central square, NY.

Data Hope mills Central square
Population 17,824 1,852
Median Age 32.5 years 41.0 years
Median Income $57,864 $58,824
Married Families 34.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Hope mills vs Central square

  • In Hope mills, the population is higher at 17,824, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
  • The median age in Central square is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 32.5 years in Hope mills.
  • Central square has a higher median income of $58,824, compared to $57,864 in Hope mills.
  • In Central square, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 34.0% in Hope mills.
  • Hope mills has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Central square.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Hope mills and Central square at 4.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Hope mills vs Central square provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hope mills Central square
Black 34 1
White 35 97
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 15 Data is updating
Two or More Races 13 2
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hope mills vs Central square

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hope mills at 34% compared to 1% in Central square.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central square at 97% compared to 35% in Hope mills.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hope mills at 1% compared to 0% in Central square.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hope mills at 15% compared to 0% in Central square.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hope mills at 13% compared to 2% in Central square.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hope mills at 2% compared to 0% in Central square.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hope mills Central square
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 11.8%
Depression 25.9% 26.8%
Smoking 17.5% 21.2%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 19.3%
Obesity 38.5% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hope mills vs Central square

  • In Central square, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central square at 26.8% versus 25.9% in Hope mills.
  • Central square has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 17.5% in Hope mills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Central square at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Hope mills.
  • Central square has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 38.5% in Hope mills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central square at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Hope mills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hope mills Central square
No Schooling 0.4% (68) 0.1% (1)
High School Diploma 14.7% (2,614) 14.2% (263)
Less than High School 6.9% (1,237) 11.0% (204)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (2,437) 19.2% (356)

Education Levels Comparison: Hope mills vs Central square

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hope mills hold a high school diploma at 14.7% compared to 14.2% in Central square.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central square at 11.0%, compared to 6.9% in Hope mills.
  • In Central square, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 13.7% in Hope mills.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.