Demographics details for Hoover, AL vs Medfield, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoover, AL vs Medfield, MA.
| Data | Hoover | Medfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92,435 | 12,904 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $101,765 | $125,000 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 64.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hoover vs Medfield
- In Hoover, the population is higher at 92,435, compared to 12,904 in Medfield.
- The median age in Medfield is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Medfield has a higher median income of $125,000, compared to $101,765 in Hoover.
- In Medfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 46.0% in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 3% in Medfield.
- Medfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Hoover vs Medfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hoover | Medfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 2 |
| White | 67 | 90 |
| Asian | 5 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hoover vs Medfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hoover at 20% compared to 2% in Medfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Medfield at 90% compared to 67% in Hoover.
- Both Hoover and Medfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hoover at 5% compared to 3% in Medfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hoover at 3% compared to 0% in Medfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hoover and Medfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hoover | Medfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 21.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoover vs Medfield
- More residents in Hoover report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hoover at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hoover at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoover at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hoover at 32.1% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hoover at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hoover | Medfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (583) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (6,787) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (3,478) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.1% (38,000) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoover vs Medfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover hold a high school diploma at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
- More residents in Hoover have less than a high school education at 3.8% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Medfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.