Demographics details for Hoover, AL vs Lyons, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoover, AL vs Lyons, GA.
Data | Hoover | Lyons |
---|---|---|
Population | 92,435 | 4,181 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 39.7 years |
Median Income | $101,765 | $29,037 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 28% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hoover vs Lyons
- In Hoover, the population is higher at 92,435, compared to 4,181 in Lyons.
- The median age in Lyons is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765 compared to $29,037 in Lyons.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hoover at 46.0% compared to 26.0% in Lyons.
- The poverty level is higher in Lyons at 28%, compared to 7% in Hoover.
- Lyons has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Hoover vs Lyons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hoover | Lyons |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 31 |
White | 67 | 50 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hoover vs Lyons
- In Lyons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 20% in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 50% in Lyons.
- The Asian population is larger in Hoover at 5% compared to 0% in Lyons.
- Lyons has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lyons at 8%, compared to 3% in Hoover.
- In Lyons, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hoover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hoover | Lyons |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 15.7% |
Depression | 21.3% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 11.0% | 22.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.3% |
Obesity | 32.1% | 44.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoover vs Lyons
- In Lyons, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.9% in Hoover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lyons at 22.4% versus 21.3% in Hoover.
- Lyons has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoover at 16.7% compared to 13.3% in Lyons.
- Lyons has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 32.1% in Hoover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lyons at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hoover | Lyons |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (583) | 1.7% (70) |
High School Diploma | 7.3% (6,787) | 26.6% (1,113) |
Less than High School | 3.8% (3,478) | 32.8% (1,372) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.1% (38,000) | 7.7% (324) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoover vs Lyons
- In Lyons, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Hoover.
- In Lyons, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lyons at 32.8%, compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 7.7% in Lyons.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.