Demographics details for Hoover, AL vs Ehrhardt, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoover, AL vs Ehrhardt, SC.
| Data | Hoover | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92,435 | 438 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 63.5 years |
| Median Income | $101,765 | $35,923 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Hoover vs Ehrhardt
- In Hoover, the population is higher at 92,435, compared to 438 in Ehrhardt.
- The median age in Ehrhardt is higher at 63.5 years, compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765 compared to $35,923 in Ehrhardt.
- In Ehrhardt, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 46.0% in Hoover.
- The poverty level is higher in Ehrhardt at 19%, compared to 7% in Hoover.
- Ehrhardt has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Hoover vs Ehrhardt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hoover | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 50 |
| White | 67 | 50 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hoover vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 50% compared to 20% in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 50% in Ehrhardt.
- The Asian population is larger in Hoover at 5% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hoover at 5% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hoover at 3% compared to 0% in Ehrhardt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hoover and Ehrhardt at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hoover | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoover vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.9% in Hoover.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hoover at 21.3% compared to 20.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Ehrhardt has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoover at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Ehrhardt.
- Ehrhardt has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 32.1% in Hoover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ehrhardt at 30.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hoover | Ehrhardt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (583) | 3.0% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (6,787) | 26.9% (118) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (3,478) | 23.5% (103) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.1% (38,000) | 27.2% (119) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoover vs Ehrhardt
- In Ehrhardt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.6% in Hoover.
- In Ehrhardt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ehrhardt at 23.5%, compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 27.2% in Ehrhardt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.