Demographics details for Hoover, AL vs Edmonds, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoover, AL vs Edmonds, WA.
Data | Hoover | Edmonds |
---|---|---|
Population | 92,435 | 42,593 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 45.8 years |
Median Income | $101,765 | $110,057 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Hoover vs Edmonds
- In Hoover, the population is higher at 92,435, compared to 42,593 in Edmonds.
- The median age in Edmonds is higher at 45.8 years, compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Edmonds has a higher median income of $110,057, compared to $101,765 in Hoover.
- In Edmonds, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 46.0% in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Edmonds.
- Edmonds has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Hoover vs Edmonds provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hoover | Edmonds |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 2 |
White | 67 | 75 |
Asian | 5 | 9 |
Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hoover vs Edmonds
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hoover at 20% compared to 2% in Edmonds.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Edmonds at 75% compared to 67% in Hoover.
- In Edmonds, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 5% in Hoover.
- Edmonds has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edmonds at 8%, compared to 3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hoover and Edmonds at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hoover | Edmonds |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 9.2% |
Depression | 21.3% | 28.1% |
Smoking | 11.0% | 9.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 32.1% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoover vs Edmonds
- In Edmonds, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Hoover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Edmonds at 28.1% versus 21.3% in Hoover.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hoover at 11.0% compared to 9.6% in Edmonds.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoover at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in Edmonds.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hoover at 32.1% compared to 31.0% in Edmonds.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Edmonds at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hoover | Edmonds |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (583) | 0.5% (232) |
High School Diploma | 7.3% (6,787) | 11.0% (4,689) |
Less than High School | 3.8% (3,478) | 4.1% (1,747) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.1% (38,000) | 38.7% (16,493) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoover vs Edmonds
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Edmonds.
- In Edmonds, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.0% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edmonds at 4.1%, compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 38.7% in Edmonds.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.