Demographics details for Hoover, AL vs Cross plains, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoover, AL vs Cross plains, TX.
| Data | Hoover | Cross plains |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92,435 | 926 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 28.3 years |
| Median Income | $101,765 | $48,516 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hoover vs Cross plains
- In Hoover, the population is higher at 92,435, compared to 926 in Cross plains.
- Residents in Hoover have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 28.3 years in Cross plains.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765 compared to $48,516 in Cross plains.
- In Cross plains, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 46.0% in Hoover.
- The poverty level is higher in Cross plains at 13%, compared to 7% in Hoover.
- Cross plains has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Hoover vs Cross plains provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hoover | Cross plains |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | Data is updating |
| White | 67 | 90 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hoover vs Cross plains
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hoover at 20% compared to 0% in Cross plains.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cross plains at 90% compared to 67% in Hoover.
- The Asian population is larger in Hoover at 5% compared to 0% in Cross plains.
- Cross plains has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cross plains at 4%, compared to 3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hoover and Cross plains at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hoover | Cross plains |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoover vs Cross plains
- In Cross plains, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.9% in Hoover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cross plains at 25.7% versus 21.3% in Hoover.
- Cross plains has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cross plains at 19.6% compared to 16.7% in Hoover.
- Cross plains has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 32.1% in Hoover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross plains at 32.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hoover | Cross plains |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (583) | 0.1% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (6,787) | 19.3% (179) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (3,478) | 6.0% (56) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.1% (38,000) | 9.2% (85) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoover vs Cross plains
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Cross plains.
- In Cross plains, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cross plains at 6.0%, compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 9.2% in Cross plains.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.