Demographics details for Hooks, TX vs Central falls, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hooks, TX vs Central falls, RI.
| Data | Hooks | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,494 | 22,490 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $52,031 | $43,092 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Hooks vs Central falls
- The population in Central falls is higher at 22,490, compared to 2,494 in Hooks.
- Residents in Hooks have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Hooks has a higher median income of $52,031 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hooks at 38.0% compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 13% in Hooks.
- Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.5% in Hooks.
Demographics
Demographics Hooks vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hooks | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 8 |
| White | 79 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 69 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hooks vs Central falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hooks at 9% compared to 8% in Central falls.
- Hooks has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- Both Hooks and Central falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 8% in Hooks.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 4% in Hooks.
- In Central falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hooks.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hooks | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.4% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hooks vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.7% in Hooks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 25.7% in Hooks.
- Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 21.1% in Hooks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hooks at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Central falls has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 39.2% in Hooks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Hooks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hooks | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.7% (1,048) |
| High School Diploma | 23.1% (576) | 15.1% (3,406) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (285) | 44.1% (9,911) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (354) | 5.6% (1,270) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hooks vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.0% in Hooks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hooks hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 11.4% in Hooks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hooks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.