Demographics details for Holt, MO vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holt, MO vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | Holt | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,262 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 47.8 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,153 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Holt vs Beaver dam
- The population in Beaver dam is higher at 16,582, compared to 4,262 in Holt.
- Residents in Holt have a higher median age of 47.8 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $55,153 in Holt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Holt at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- Holt has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Holt is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Holt vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Holt | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 94 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Holt vs Beaver dam
- In Beaver dam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Holt.
- Holt has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 81% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Holt.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Holt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaver dam at 6%, compared to 3% in Holt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Holt and Beaver dam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Holt | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 40.1% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holt vs Beaver dam
- More residents in Holt report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Holt at 24.9% compared to 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Holt at 20.7% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 17.9% in Holt.
- Obesity rates are higher in Holt at 40.1% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Holt at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Holt | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (17) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 30.4% (1,294) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (389) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (658) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holt vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Holt have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Holt hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 23.8% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaver dam at 10.3%, compared to 9.1% in Holt.
- In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 15.4% in Holt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.