Demographics details for Holly springs, NC vs Carleton, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Holly springs, NC vs Carleton, MI.

Data Holly springs Carleton
Population 45,945 2,350
Median Age 35.7 years 38.3 years
Median Income $127,755 $54,028
Married Families 43.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Holly springs vs Carleton

  • In Holly springs, the population is higher at 45,945, compared to 2,350 in Carleton.
  • The median age in Carleton is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 35.7 years in Holly springs.
  • Holly springs has a higher median income of $127,755 compared to $54,028 in Carleton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Holly springs at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Carleton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Carleton at 8%, compared to 5% in Holly springs.
  • Carleton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Holly springs.

Demographics

Demographics Holly springs vs Carleton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Holly springs Carleton
Black 9 1
White 73 84
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 5
Two or More Races 6 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Holly springs vs Carleton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Holly springs at 9% compared to 1% in Carleton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Carleton at 84% compared to 73% in Holly springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Holly springs at 6% compared to 0% in Carleton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Holly springs at 6% compared to 5% in Carleton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carleton at 10%, compared to 6% in Holly springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Holly springs and Carleton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Holly springs Carleton
Mental Health Not Good 12.2% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 10.6%
Depression 19.4% 24.1%
Smoking 9.7% 17.4%
Binge Drinking 20.9% 19.8%
Obesity 30.4% 39.4%
Disability Percentage 4.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Holly springs vs Carleton

  • In Carleton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 12.2% in Holly springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Carleton at 24.1% versus 19.4% in Holly springs.
  • Carleton has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 9.7% in Holly springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Holly springs at 20.9% compared to 19.8% in Carleton.
  • Carleton has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 30.4% in Holly springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carleton at 21.0% compared to 4.0% in Holly springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Holly springs Carleton
No Schooling 0.5% (232) 0.6% (15)
High School Diploma 4.2% (1,945) 30.3% (713)
Less than High School 4.3% (1,965) 20.8% (488)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.1% (16,598) 6.8% (160)

Education Levels Comparison: Holly springs vs Carleton

  • In Carleton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Holly springs.
  • In Carleton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 4.2% in Holly springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carleton at 20.8%, compared to 4.3% in Holly springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Holly springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.1% compared to 6.8% in Carleton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.