Demographics details for Hollister, NC vs Burkburnett, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hollister, NC vs Burkburnett, TX.
| Data | Hollister | Burkburnett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 847 | 11,102 |
| Median Age | 34.3 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $39,913 | $62,143 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hollister vs Burkburnett
- The population in Burkburnett is higher at 11,102, compared to 847 in Hollister.
- The median age in Burkburnett is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 34.3 years in Hollister.
- Burkburnett has a higher median income of $62,143, compared to $39,913 in Hollister.
- In Burkburnett, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Hollister.
- Hollister has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Burkburnett.
- The unemployment rate in Hollister is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Burkburnett.
Demographics
Demographics Hollister vs Burkburnett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hollister | Burkburnett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 2 |
| White | 21 | 73 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | 41 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hollister vs Burkburnett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hollister at 16% compared to 2% in Burkburnett.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burkburnett at 73% compared to 21% in Hollister.
- The Asian population is larger in Hollister at 5% compared to 0% in Burkburnett.
- Burkburnett has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Hollister.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hollister at 13% compared to 8% in Burkburnett.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hollister at 41% compared to 1% in Burkburnett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hollister | Burkburnett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 31.3% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hollister vs Burkburnett
- More residents in Hollister report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 18.6% in Burkburnett.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burkburnett at 26.3% versus 24.6% in Hollister.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hollister at 31.3% compared to 18.0% in Burkburnett.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burkburnett at 19.7% compared to 14.9% in Hollister.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hollister at 44.9% compared to 35.0% in Burkburnett.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hollister at 25.0% compared to 20.0% in Burkburnett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hollister | Burkburnett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.9% (33) | 1.6% (182) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (178) | 19.6% (2,172) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (104) | 13.9% (1,543) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (91) | 14.6% (1,618) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hollister vs Burkburnett
- A higher percentage of residents in Hollister have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 1.6% in Burkburnett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hollister hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 19.6% in Burkburnett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burkburnett at 13.9%, compared to 12.3% in Hollister.
- In Burkburnett, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 10.7% in Hollister.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.