Demographics details for Holdenville, OK vs Paupack, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holdenville, OK vs Paupack, PA.
Data | Holdenville | Paupack |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,916 | 1,000 |
Median Age | 36.1 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $38,232 | $60,000 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 300.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Holdenville vs Paupack
- In Holdenville, the population is higher at 5,916, compared to 1,000 in Paupack.
- The median age in Paupack is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.1 years in Holdenville.
- Paupack has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $38,232 in Holdenville.
- In Paupack, the percentage of married families is higher at 300.0%, compared to 22.0% in Holdenville.
- Holdenville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 8% in Paupack.
- The unemployment rate in Holdenville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Paupack.
Demographics
Demographics Holdenville vs Paupack provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Holdenville | Paupack |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 2 |
White | 55 | 90 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 20 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Holdenville vs Paupack
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Holdenville at 7% compared to 2% in Paupack.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Paupack at 90% compared to 55% in Holdenville.
- In Paupack, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Holdenville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Holdenville at 9% compared to 3% in Paupack.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Holdenville at 8% compared to 0% in Paupack.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Holdenville at 20% compared to 0% in Paupack.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Holdenville | Paupack |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 24.6% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 27.5% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 43.3% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holdenville vs Paupack
- More residents in Holdenville report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Depression is more prevalent in Holdenville at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Holdenville at 27.5% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Binge drinking is more common in Holdenville at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Obesity rates are higher in Holdenville at 43.3% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Disability percentages are higher in Holdenville at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Holdenville | Paupack |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 23.1% (1,369) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 24.9% (1,471) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (415) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holdenville vs Paupack
- A higher percentage of residents in Holdenville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- A higher percentage of residents in Holdenville hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- More residents in Holdenville have less than a high school education at 24.9% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- A higher percentage of residents in Holdenville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.