Demographics details for Holcomb, KS vs South windsor, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holcomb, KS vs South windsor, CT.
Data | Holcomb | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,199 | 26,054 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $81,111 | $90,964 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 62.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Holcomb vs South windsor
- The population in South windsor is higher at 26,054, compared to 2,199 in Holcomb.
- The median age in South windsor is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 29.8 years in Holcomb.
- South windsor has a higher median income of $90,964, compared to $81,111 in Holcomb.
- In South windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 44.0% in Holcomb.
- Holcomb has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in South windsor.
- South windsor has a higher unemployment rate at 2.2% compared to 2.0% in Holcomb.
Demographics
Demographics Holcomb vs South windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Holcomb | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 9 |
White | 36 | 85 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 45 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Holcomb vs South windsor
- In South windsor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Holcomb.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South windsor at 85% compared to 36% in Holcomb.
- In South windsor, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Holcomb.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Holcomb at 45% compared to 3% in South windsor.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Holcomb at 17% compared to 2% in South windsor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Holcomb and South windsor at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Holcomb | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.1% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 36.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holcomb vs South windsor
- More residents in Holcomb report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Depression is more prevalent in Holcomb at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Holcomb at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Binge drinking is more common in Holcomb at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Obesity rates are higher in Holcomb at 36.9% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Holcomb at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Holcomb | South windsor |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.5% (340) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 21.8% (479) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (188) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holcomb vs South windsor
- A higher percentage of residents in Holcomb have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Holcomb hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- More residents in Holcomb have less than a high school education at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Holcomb hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.5% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.