Demographics details for Holcomb, KS vs Lugoff, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holcomb, KS vs Lugoff, SC.
Data | Holcomb | Lugoff |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,199 | 9,423 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $81,111 | $57,885 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Holcomb vs Lugoff
- The population in Lugoff is higher at 9,423, compared to 2,199 in Holcomb.
- The median age in Lugoff is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 29.8 years in Holcomb.
- Holcomb has a higher median income of $81,111 compared to $57,885 in Lugoff.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Holcomb at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Lugoff.
- Holcomb has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Lugoff.
- Lugoff has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 2.0% in Holcomb.
Demographics
Demographics Holcomb vs Lugoff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Holcomb | Lugoff |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 21 |
White | 36 | 73 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 45 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Holcomb vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Holcomb.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lugoff at 73% compared to 36% in Holcomb.
- The Asian population is larger in Holcomb at 2% compared to 0% in Lugoff.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Holcomb at 45% compared to 3% in Lugoff.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Holcomb at 17% compared to 3% in Lugoff.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Holcomb and Lugoff at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Holcomb | Lugoff |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 11.6% |
Depression | 19.0% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 36.9% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holcomb vs Lugoff
- In Lugoff, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.9% in Holcomb.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lugoff at 22.5% versus 19.0% in Holcomb.
- Lugoff has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 17.1% in Holcomb.
- Binge drinking is more common in Holcomb at 19.5% compared to 16.7% in Lugoff.
- Obesity rates are higher in Holcomb at 36.9% compared to 34.1% in Lugoff.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lugoff at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Holcomb.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Holcomb | Lugoff |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 0.9% (83) |
High School Diploma | 15.5% (340) | 19.6% (1,843) |
Less than High School | 21.8% (479) | 8.3% (778) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (188) | 16.3% (1,537) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holcomb vs Lugoff
- A higher percentage of residents in Holcomb have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Lugoff.
- In Lugoff, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 15.5% in Holcomb.
- More residents in Holcomb have less than a high school education at 21.8% compared to 8.3% in Lugoff.
- In Lugoff, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 8.5% in Holcomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.