Demographics details for Holcomb, KS vs Coleman, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holcomb, KS vs Coleman, OK.
| Data | Holcomb | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,199 | 297 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $81,111 | $45,938 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Holcomb vs Coleman
- In Holcomb, the population is higher at 2,199, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- The median age in Coleman is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 29.8 years in Holcomb.
- Holcomb has a higher median income of $81,111 compared to $45,938 in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Holcomb at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Coleman.
- The poverty level is higher in Coleman at 12%, compared to 10% in Holcomb.
- Coleman has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.0% in Holcomb.
Demographics
Demographics Holcomb vs Coleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Holcomb | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 36 | 77 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 45 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Holcomb vs Coleman
- In Coleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Holcomb.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Coleman at 77% compared to 36% in Holcomb.
- The Asian population is larger in Holcomb at 2% compared to 0% in Coleman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Holcomb at 45% compared to 1% in Coleman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Holcomb at 17% compared to 9% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 0% in Holcomb.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Holcomb | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holcomb vs Coleman
- In Coleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 14.9% in Holcomb.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coleman at 26.9% versus 19.0% in Holcomb.
- Coleman has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 17.1% in Holcomb.
- Binge drinking is more common in Holcomb at 19.5% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Coleman has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 36.9% in Holcomb.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 9.0% in Holcomb.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Holcomb | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (340) | 28.6% (85) |
| Less than High School | 21.8% (479) | 4.0% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (188) | 11.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holcomb vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Holcomb have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 15.5% in Holcomb.
- More residents in Holcomb have less than a high school education at 21.8% compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.5% in Holcomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.