Demographics details for Holcomb, KS vs Central city, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holcomb, KS vs Central city, NE.
| Data | Holcomb | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,199 | 3,078 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $81,111 | $54,063 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Holcomb vs Central city
- The population in Central city is higher at 3,078, compared to 2,199 in Holcomb.
- The median age in Central city is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 29.8 years in Holcomb.
- Holcomb has a higher median income of $81,111 compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Holcomb at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- Holcomb has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher unemployment rate at 2.5% compared to 2.0% in Holcomb.
Demographics
Demographics Holcomb vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Holcomb | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 36 | 86 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 45 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Holcomb vs Central city
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Holcomb and Central city at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 86% compared to 36% in Holcomb.
- In Central city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Holcomb.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Holcomb at 45% compared to 7% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Holcomb at 17% compared to 4% in Central city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Holcomb and Central city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Holcomb | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holcomb vs Central city
- More residents in Holcomb report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Holcomb at 19.0% compared to 18.6% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Holcomb.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 20.0% compared to 19.5% in Holcomb.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 36.9% in Holcomb.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Holcomb.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Holcomb | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (25) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (340) | 23.4% (721) |
| Less than High School | 21.8% (479) | 5.8% (178) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (188) | 13.1% (404) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holcomb vs Central city
- A higher percentage of residents in Holcomb have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 15.5% in Holcomb.
- More residents in Holcomb have less than a high school education at 21.8% compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- In Central city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 8.5% in Holcomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.