Demographics details for Hobbs, NM vs Stanchfield, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobbs, NM vs Stanchfield, MN.
| Data | Hobbs | Stanchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,648 | 94 |
| Median Age | 30.8 years | 27.6 years |
| Median Income | $63,804 | $64,583 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hobbs vs Stanchfield
- In Hobbs, the population is higher at 39,648, compared to 94 in Stanchfield.
- Residents in Hobbs have a higher median age of 30.8 years compared to 27.6 years in Stanchfield.
- Stanchfield has a higher median income of $64,583, compared to $63,804 in Hobbs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hobbs at 32.0% compared to 24.0% in Stanchfield.
- Hobbs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Stanchfield.
- The unemployment rate in Hobbs is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Stanchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Hobbs vs Stanchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobbs | Stanchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 17 |
| White | 4 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 63 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 25 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Hobbs vs Stanchfield
- In Stanchfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stanchfield at 70% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- The Asian population is larger in Hobbs at 1% compared to 0% in Stanchfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hobbs at 63% compared to 0% in Stanchfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hobbs at 25% compared to 3% in Stanchfield.
- In Stanchfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 1% in Hobbs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobbs | Stanchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobbs vs Stanchfield
- More residents in Hobbs report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.2% in Stanchfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stanchfield at 23.9% versus 20.6% in Hobbs.
- Stanchfield has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 17.7% in Hobbs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stanchfield at 20.4% compared to 15.4% in Hobbs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hobbs at 41.7% compared to 36.0% in Stanchfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hobbs at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Stanchfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobbs | Stanchfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (856) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.9% (6,312) | 9.6% (9) |
| Less than High School | 26.2% (10,381) | 38.3% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (3,667) | 5.3% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobbs vs Stanchfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Stanchfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 9.6% in Stanchfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stanchfield at 38.3%, compared to 26.2% in Hobbs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 5.3% in Stanchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.