Demographics details for Hobbs, NM vs Spring valley, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobbs, NM vs Spring valley, NY.
| Data | Hobbs | Spring valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,648 | 32,884 |
| Median Age | 30.8 years | 27.5 years |
| Median Income | $63,804 | $50,749 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Hobbs vs Spring valley
- In Hobbs, the population is higher at 39,648, compared to 32,884 in Spring valley.
- Residents in Hobbs have a higher median age of 30.8 years compared to 27.5 years in Spring valley.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804 compared to $50,749 in Spring valley.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Hobbs and Spring valley at 32.0%.
- Hobbs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Spring valley.
- The unemployment rate in Hobbs is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.2% in Spring valley.
Demographics
Demographics Hobbs vs Spring valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobbs | Spring valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 32 |
| White | 4 | 31 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 63 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 25 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hobbs vs Spring valley
- In Spring valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spring valley at 31% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- In Spring valley, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Hobbs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hobbs at 63% compared to 29% in Spring valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hobbs at 25% compared to 5% in Spring valley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hobbs at 1% compared to 0% in Spring valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobbs | Spring valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 12.6% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 34.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobbs vs Spring valley
- More residents in Hobbs report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.7% in Spring valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hobbs at 20.6% compared to 18.7% in Spring valley.
- Spring valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 17.7% in Hobbs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 12.6% in Spring valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hobbs at 41.7% compared to 34.3% in Spring valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hobbs at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Spring valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobbs | Spring valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (856) | 3.7% (1,224) |
| High School Diploma | 15.9% (6,312) | 13.1% (4,315) |
| Less than High School | 26.2% (10,381) | 20.5% (6,742) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (3,667) | 10.0% (3,273) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobbs vs Spring valley
- In Spring valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 2.2% in Hobbs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 13.1% in Spring valley.
- More residents in Hobbs have less than a high school education at 26.2% compared to 20.5% in Spring valley.
- In Spring valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.0% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.