Demographics details for Hobbs, NM vs Southington, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobbs, NM vs Southington, CT.
Data | Hobbs | Southington |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,648 | 43,807 |
Median Age | 30.8 years | Data is updating |
Median Income | $63,804 | $Data is updating |
Married Families | 32.0% | Data is updating |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Hobbs vs Southington
- The population in Southington is higher at 43,807, compared to 39,648 in Hobbs.
- Residents in Hobbs have a higher median age of 30.8 years compared to 0.0 years in Southington.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804 compared to $0 in Southington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hobbs at 32.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- Hobbs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Southington.
- The unemployment rate in Hobbs is higher at 4.9%, compared to 2.2% in Southington.
Demographics
Demographics Hobbs vs Southington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hobbs | Southington |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 4 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 63 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 25 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hobbs vs Southington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hobbs at 6% compared to 0% in Southington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Southington at 100% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- The Asian population is larger in Hobbs at 1% compared to 0% in Southington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hobbs at 63% compared to 0% in Southington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hobbs at 25% compared to 0% in Southington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hobbs at 1% compared to 0% in Southington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hobbs | Southington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 20.6% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 41.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobbs vs Southington
- More residents in Hobbs report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hobbs at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hobbs at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hobbs at 41.7% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hobbs at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hobbs | Southington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (856) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.9% (6,312) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 26.2% (10,381) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (3,667) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobbs vs Southington
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- More residents in Hobbs have less than a high school education at 26.2% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.