Demographics details for Hobbs, NM vs Shelbyville, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobbs, NM vs Shelbyville, TN.
| Data | Hobbs | Shelbyville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,648 | 24,452 |
| Median Age | 30.8 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $63,804 | $50,694 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Hobbs vs Shelbyville
- In Hobbs, the population is higher at 39,648, compared to 24,452 in Shelbyville.
- The median age in Shelbyville is higher at 31.3 years, compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804 compared to $50,694 in Shelbyville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hobbs at 32.0% compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Hobbs and Shelbyville at 15%.
- The unemployment rate in Hobbs is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Hobbs vs Shelbyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobbs | Shelbyville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 11 |
| White | 4 | 51 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 63 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 25 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Hobbs vs Shelbyville
- In Shelbyville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbyville at 51% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- The Asian population is larger in Hobbs at 1% compared to 0% in Shelbyville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hobbs at 63% compared to 24% in Shelbyville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hobbs at 25% compared to 12% in Shelbyville.
- In Shelbyville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Hobbs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobbs | Shelbyville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 27.5% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobbs vs Shelbyville
- In Shelbyville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.1% in Hobbs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbyville at 27.5% versus 20.6% in Hobbs.
- Shelbyville has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 17.7% in Hobbs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 14.3% in Shelbyville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hobbs at 41.7% compared to 39.4% in Shelbyville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbyville at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobbs | Shelbyville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (856) | 0.8% (185) |
| High School Diploma | 15.9% (6,312) | 21.6% (5,273) |
| Less than High School | 26.2% (10,381) | 20.7% (5,051) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (3,667) | 7.7% (1,889) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobbs vs Shelbyville
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.8% in Shelbyville.
- In Shelbyville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 15.9% in Hobbs.
- More residents in Hobbs have less than a high school education at 26.2% compared to 20.7% in Shelbyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.