Demographics details for Hobbs, NM vs Rockville centre, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobbs, NM vs Rockville centre, NY.
Data | Hobbs | Rockville centre |
---|---|---|
Population | 39,648 | 25,662 |
Median Age | 30.8 years | 43.6 years |
Median Income | $63,804 | $147,361 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Hobbs vs Rockville centre
- In Hobbs, the population is higher at 39,648, compared to 25,662 in Rockville centre.
- The median age in Rockville centre is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Rockville centre has a higher median income of $147,361, compared to $63,804 in Hobbs.
- In Rockville centre, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 32.0% in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Rockville centre.
- The unemployment rate in Hobbs is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.1% in Rockville centre.
Demographics
Demographics Hobbs vs Rockville centre provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hobbs | Rockville centre |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 4 |
White | 4 | 77 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 63 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 25 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hobbs vs Rockville centre
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hobbs at 6% compared to 4% in Rockville centre.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockville centre at 77% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- In Rockville centre, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Hobbs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hobbs at 63% compared to 9% in Rockville centre.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hobbs at 25% compared to 4% in Rockville centre.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hobbs at 1% compared to 0% in Rockville centre.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hobbs | Rockville centre |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 12.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 7.5% |
Depression | 20.6% | 16.9% |
Smoking | 17.7% | 9.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 41.7% | 26.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobbs vs Rockville centre
- More residents in Hobbs report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.8% in Rockville centre.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hobbs at 20.6% compared to 16.9% in Rockville centre.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hobbs at 17.7% compared to 9.7% in Rockville centre.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockville centre at 18.5% compared to 15.4% in Hobbs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hobbs at 41.7% compared to 26.0% in Rockville centre.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hobbs at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Rockville centre.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hobbs | Rockville centre |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (856) | 0.8% (200) |
High School Diploma | 15.9% (6,312) | 9.4% (2,406) |
Less than High School | 26.2% (10,381) | 6.2% (1,582) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (3,667) | 44.6% (11,456) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobbs vs Rockville centre
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.8% in Rockville centre.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 9.4% in Rockville centre.
- More residents in Hobbs have less than a high school education at 26.2% compared to 6.2% in Rockville centre.
- In Rockville centre, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.6% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.