Demographics details for Hobbs, NM vs Laurinburg, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobbs, NM vs Laurinburg, NC.
| Data | Hobbs | Laurinburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,648 | 14,908 |
| Median Age | 30.8 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $63,804 | $38,015 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Hobbs vs Laurinburg
- In Hobbs, the population is higher at 39,648, compared to 14,908 in Laurinburg.
- The median age in Laurinburg is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804 compared to $38,015 in Laurinburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hobbs at 32.0% compared to 27.0% in Laurinburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurinburg at 21%, compared to 15% in Hobbs.
- Laurinburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.9% in Hobbs.
Demographics
Demographics Hobbs vs Laurinburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobbs | Laurinburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 49 |
| White | 4 | 32 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 63 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 25 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Hobbs vs Laurinburg
- In Laurinburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurinburg at 32% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- Both Hobbs and Laurinburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hobbs at 63% compared to 5% in Laurinburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hobbs at 25% compared to 6% in Laurinburg.
- In Laurinburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 1% in Hobbs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobbs | Laurinburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 23.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobbs vs Laurinburg
- In Laurinburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.1% in Hobbs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurinburg at 23.8% versus 20.6% in Hobbs.
- Laurinburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 17.7% in Hobbs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 14.0% in Laurinburg.
- Laurinburg has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 41.7% in Hobbs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurinburg at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobbs | Laurinburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (856) | 0.5% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 15.9% (6,312) | 18.8% (2,799) |
| Less than High School | 26.2% (10,381) | 13.6% (2,024) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (3,667) | 12.2% (1,826) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobbs vs Laurinburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobbs have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.5% in Laurinburg.
- In Laurinburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 15.9% in Hobbs.
- More residents in Hobbs have less than a high school education at 26.2% compared to 13.6% in Laurinburg.
- In Laurinburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.