Demographics details for Hobart, NY vs Wichita falls, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobart, NY vs Wichita falls, TX.
| Data | Hobart | Wichita falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 400 | 102,664 |
| Median Age | 48.2 years | 32.8 years |
| Median Income | $80,208 | $55,584 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Hobart vs Wichita falls
- The population in Wichita falls is higher at 102,664, compared to 400 in Hobart.
- Residents in Hobart have a higher median age of 48.2 years compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
- Hobart has a higher median income of $80,208 compared to $55,584 in Wichita falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hobart at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Wichita falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Wichita falls at 14%, compared to 10% in Hobart.
- Wichita falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Hobart.
Demographics
Demographics Hobart vs Wichita falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobart | Wichita falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 93 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hobart vs Wichita falls
- In Wichita falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 54% in Wichita falls.
- In Wichita falls, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Hobart.
- Wichita falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 0% in Hobart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wichita falls at 8%, compared to 4% in Hobart.
- In Wichita falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hobart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobart | Wichita falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobart vs Wichita falls
- In Wichita falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.2% in Hobart.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hobart at 25.3% compared to 24.6% in Wichita falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hobart at 20.4% compared to 18.6% in Wichita falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 18.3% in Hobart.
- Wichita falls has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 33.5% in Hobart.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hobart at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Wichita falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobart | Wichita falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (2) | 1.0% (1,035) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (91) | 15.1% (15,510) |
| Less than High School | 19.5% (78) | 14.6% (14,970) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (67) | 15.1% (15,550) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobart vs Wichita falls
- In Wichita falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
- More residents in Hobart have less than a high school education at 19.5% compared to 14.6% in Wichita falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.