Demographics details for Hobart, NY vs Sacramento, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobart, NY vs Sacramento, CA.
| Data | Hobart | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 400 | 528,001 |
| Median Age | 48.2 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $80,208 | $78,954 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Hobart vs Sacramento
- The population in Sacramento is higher at 528,001, compared to 400 in Hobart.
- Residents in Hobart have a higher median age of 48.2 years compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
- Hobart has a higher median income of $80,208 compared to $78,954 in Sacramento.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hobart at 40.0% compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
- The poverty level is higher in Sacramento at 12%, compared to 10% in Hobart.
- Sacramento has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Hobart.
Demographics
Demographics Hobart vs Sacramento provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobart | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 93 | 26 |
| Asian | 2 | 19 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hobart vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 2% in Hobart.
- Sacramento has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 0% in Hobart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sacramento at 13%, compared to 4% in Hobart.
- In Sacramento, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hobart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobart | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobart vs Sacramento
- More residents in Hobart report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.6% in Sacramento.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hobart at 25.3% compared to 18.3% in Sacramento.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hobart at 20.4% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hobart at 18.3% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hobart at 33.5% compared to 32.7% in Sacramento.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hobart at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Sacramento.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobart | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (2) | 2.7% (14,512) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (91) | 11.7% (62,039) |
| Less than High School | 19.5% (78) | 14.7% (77,760) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (67) | 24.4% (128,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobart vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
- More residents in Hobart have less than a high school education at 19.5% compared to 14.7% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 16.8% in Hobart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.