Demographics details for Hobart, NY vs Abilene, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobart, NY vs Abilene, TX.
| Data | Hobart | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 400 | 127,385 |
| Median Age | 48.2 years | 32.2 years |
| Median Income | $80,208 | $59,254 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Hobart vs Abilene
- The population in Abilene is higher at 127,385, compared to 400 in Hobart.
- Residents in Hobart have a higher median age of 48.2 years compared to 32.2 years in Abilene.
- Hobart has a higher median income of $80,208 compared to $59,254 in Abilene.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hobart at 40.0% compared to 35.0% in Abilene.
- The poverty level is higher in Abilene at 12%, compared to 10% in Hobart.
- Abilene has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Hobart.
Demographics
Demographics Hobart vs Abilene provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobart | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 10 |
| White | 93 | 49 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hobart vs Abilene
- In Abilene, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 49% in Abilene.
- Both Hobart and Abilene have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Abilene has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 0% in Hobart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Abilene at 12%, compared to 4% in Hobart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hobart and Abilene at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobart | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobart vs Abilene
- In Abilene, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.2% in Hobart.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hobart at 25.3% compared to 22.8% in Abilene.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hobart at 20.4% compared to 18.2% in Abilene.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Hobart and Abilene at 18.3%.
- Abilene has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 33.5% in Hobart.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hobart at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Abilene.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobart | Abilene |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (2) | 0.9% (1,096) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (91) | 13.7% (17,400) |
| Less than High School | 19.5% (78) | 13.7% (17,433) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (67) | 16.0% (20,428) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobart vs Abilene
- In Abilene, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 13.7% in Abilene.
- More residents in Hobart have less than a high school education at 19.5% compared to 13.7% in Abilene.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Abilene.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.